The Changing Perspectives of Cryptozoology Part 1: Ronald Murphy

For years, I have been fascinated in the evolution of cryptozoological thought. There are clear fractures happening in the field, but I don't really see a ton of discussion about it in public. Yet, I have had plenty of personal conversations with a variety of researchers about the changes. So, I decided it would be valuable to the field to ask a variety of researchers, all with different approaches and expertise, the same five questions about the field today. Hopefully, the differences in answers will be valuable information on the diversity of thought in the field. My first interview was with my close friend, the Crypto-Guru himself: Ronald Murphy. 

Ronald Murphy has been involved in cryptozoology for over 30 years. Much of his research has been focused on the historical and mythical archetypes of cryptids, a topic which he has written a whole host of books on. He is also a prominent researcher into the fortean hot spot of the Chestnut Ridge in Eastern Pennsylvania. 

1. What is cryptozoology as you see it?

Ron: The study of unknown animals. Now this doesn't have to be as sensational as looking for bigfoot or the Loch Ness monster. In fact, I'm quite interested on sighting of animal that are considered extinct being seen in areas where the once inhabited. The Eastern cougar in Pennsylvania, for instance. Cryptozoology is far more akin to biology than the paranormal. 

2. Where do you think cryptozoology is headed in the next few years?

Ron: I would like to see the subject offered as a course in mainstream academia but my fear is so many television personalities refer to themselves as cryptozoologists that there will never be a serious approach to such a fringe discipline. Unless, of course, a self-declared cryptozoologist finds something!

3. Who do you think (living or deceased) has had the biggest impact on the state of cryptozoology in today's world?

Ron: Heuvelmans without a doubt. He is the progenitor of this discipline 

4. What, if any, have been cryptozoology's biggest contributions to modern science?

Ron: Great question! I have to say that no one who is called a cryptozoologist has really impacted the scientific field with a discovery. Science demands facts. That is the cold, hard realization. Unless the scientific method is applied I truly don't believe and unknown creature will be uncovered unless by happenstance. 

5. Why do you think that paranormal and ufological subjects have been gaining traction within the field of cryptozoology?

Ron: Another great question. For lack of proof of the existence of bigfoot for nearly 70 years of searching, it is easy to throw up your hands and declare "it's not of this planet" or "it is interdimensional." It is a copout. Also, it is a sensational story that sells books and television programming. I find the conjecture fascinating to be honest. It is part of myth-building. But again we need proof and not simply a blanket apology of "aliens."

Ron and myself at a conference in 2016.