In my nearly six years as an active cryptozoologist, I have never seen such a large, polarizing, and dividing crypto-news story. Nearly everyone had an opinion. It seemed to come up in conversations on podcasts and at conferences more than any other topic I've seen (besides, perhaps Bigfoot). It was an exciting time for cryptozoology, and in the middle of it all was Lon Strickler.
I first met Lon back in May 2017 after the wave had been going on for a few months already. He was extremely friendly and we had a good, if brief, chat about our respective opinions and research on various topics. Because of that, and later having the chance to work with Lon at WCJV Radio for a short time, I wholeheartedly believe that Lon is an upstanding person and an effective investigator.
Near the end of the wave and the end of the year, the sightings were winding down, but the controversy seemed to explode. Both Lon and Loren Coleman were publishing books on the Mothman, and both were covering the Chicago sightings. Coleman and others began to criticise Lon's work and stirred up quite a social media debate on the matter.
Because of this, I was rather looking forward to reading Lon's book on the topic. I had had Loren on my radio show to discuss his, so I wanted to see the other side of the story if you will. After I read it the first time, I realized that this is something I would need to wait and digest for a while before I made a review. This was mostly due to the controversial nature of the topic, but also because of my own slightly controversial opinions on the matter. This is why my review of the book is a little belated, but I think that it was important for me to find the right words before I tried to enter these rough waters.
Firstly, I did enjoy the book. It was a fun and easy read. Most of it was taken directly from the eyewitnesses' reports, with Lon gently narrating the story as it progressed. It did feel a little disjointed, as Lon tended to jump around a bit with the various stories and topics he wanted to cover, but that certainly isn't a deal breaker.
I think my biggest criticism of the book is the lack of skepticism in Lon's analysis of the reports. I do not think that he should automatically think that the witnesses are lying to him or that the only thing the witnesses saw was a big drone, but it is important to examine the physical and known explanations of any mystery encounter. Even if the witness is insistent that they saw a giant bat, and you are inclined to believe them, you still should at least consider many of the alternative explanations. When the alternatives were brought up, it was generally by one of the many researchers and readers of Lon's blog who gave their opinions at the end of the book, but Lon does not address them further than note whether or not he agrees. It's important to remember that people's eyes can be fooled. Quite easily.
Finally, the book does an excellent job of bringing together the mass of relevant reports in a readable fashion. I think that is where the book truly succeeds.
Overall, Mothman Dynasty is a bit of a mixed bag. On one hand, I certainly think that there were some missing perspectives and possibilities. On the other hand, it was a good read and I'm sure that many of my readers will also enjoy it.
You can buy Mothman Dynasty here.
You can find Lon's blog Phantoms and Monsters here.