For years, I have been fascinated in the evolution of cryptozoological thought. There are clear fractures happening in the field, but I don't really see a ton of discussion about it in public. Yet, I have had plenty of personal conversations with a variety of researchers about the changes. So, I decided it would be valuable to the field to ask a variety of researchers, all with different approaches and expertise, the same five questions about the field today. Hopefully, the differences in answers will be valuable information on the diversity of thought in the field.
My first interview in the series was with the Crypto-Guru himself: Ronald Murphy. You can read that interview here.
Kenney Irish aka the "Cryptopunkologist" is a cryptid researcher located in New York. His most recent book, American Cryptids, has topped the Amazon ranking for its genre. He often works with the New York Bigfoot Society and has appeared on numerous podcasts and radio shows. You can find him at www.kwirish.com
1. What is cryptozoology as you see it?
Kenney: Cryptozoology was first presented to me as a study/research regarding the possible existence of a species that has not been categorized and recognized by means of traditional science and practices. When we first learn of Cryptozoology, in most cases it is presented via some elusive land beast or aquatic serpentine creature. Individuals who claim the title, seek answers using some means of practical sciences, along with studies in Native American folklore. There are a select few that carry the title, that also seek out to prove certain animals that are said to be extinct, still roam the land, and seas to this day.
2. Where do you think cryptozoology is headed in the next few years?
Kenney: With the subject becoming increasingly popular, and not requiring or needing any type of education, I see it becoming increasingly congested and reckless. Personally, at some point I long to see some form of actual, and recognized educational training presented using both science and history via some university type establishment.
3. Who do you think (living or deceased) has had the biggest impact on the state of cryptozoology in today's world?
Kenney: My answer is short and direct, anyone who studies the subject and “does not” draw a line in the sand based off one’s own opinion, theory, or feelings. This subject currently holds no accountability regarding truth. The individuals who are open to communication are the ones who serve with making the biggest impact to the subject.
4. What, if any, have been cryptozoology's biggest contributions to modern science?
Kenney: Cryptozoology in many ways has challenged traditional thinking and science, and really pushes the envelope. It has brought to light many strange, and unexplained occurrences that in the past was swept under the rug, and or laughed at. Over the years, it has also to a degree, faded the stigma and moved the line drawn in the sand, between scientists that are faithful to practical science, and the science professionals who are intrigued, and believe there is something to the phenomenon.
5. Why do you think that paranormal and ufological subjects have been gaining traction within the field of cryptozoology?
Kenney: With the countless eyewitnesses across the globe, varying in encounter description, it is not easy to believe that something of a “flesh and blood” being could elude most cameras and current modern-day technology. Also, it gives a “reason” why. Which for some individuals, this helps them explain with confidence what they don’t understand or can explain. While others claim to have seen something of a Sasquatch description vanish before their very eyes, others claim to have seen such a creature walking out of what they believed to be an extraterrestrial space craft, or in the area of the craft.
No comments:
Post a Comment